The Redundancy of Real Estate - and how to avoid it.

The Redundancy of Real Estate - and how to avoid it.

On November the 10th, Apple unveiled its new M1 System on a Chip. A processor so fast, and so abstemious in its power consumption, that it has in effect blown up the laptop PC industry. The new $999 MacBook Air is as fast as a $6000 MacBook Pro of 3 years ago. And this is the entry level processor. Over the next two years larger, more powerful versions will be developed to power the entire Apple range of computers.

And with this the Intel based era of computing will come to an end. For sure, Intel will still be a huge company for years to come, but its dominance has been eradicated, just like that. As John Gruber the technology commentator has written ‘The M1 Macs are such better machines than their Intel-based predecessors it’s hard to believe.’

During the same month we have seen the announcement of not one, but three, new vaccines to counter Covid-19. Each developed in less than a year, a feat of extraordinary brilliance, as the norm for developing vaccines is measured in decades not years.

And these ground breaking technological developments have taken place during a global pandemic where almost every knowledge worker is working from home. And where the process of development has spanned many countries, and continents. Extraordinary feats of intellect, #NoOfficeRequired.

Which tells us what?

Well, according to many in real estate, not a lot. Repeatedly I come across comments online about how ‘offices are needed for creative work’ or ‘relationships need physical proximity to build’ or ‘you cannot innovate sitting on the sofa’ or ‘we’re all surviving on relationships we had pre Covid’.

Some go even further. Stephen Bird, CEO of Aberdeen Standard Life was recently quoted as saying “You cannot change the world from home, It’s an absolute falsehood. It’s lazy thinking, it lacks courage and it’s delinquent on the next generation.”. Not someone from real estate admittedly but I get the feeling many in our industry would agree with him.

It’s hard to know where to start in explaining just how dangerous and deluded such thinking is, but I think it all stems from a lack of awareness of technological progress combined with poor personal digital skills. People are talking about things they know little about. Taking advice on driving from someone who doesn’t drive makes no sense. And we shouldn’t do it.

Working in a distributed company is not the same as working in an office centric one. It’s never the case, long term, that you can move to being a distributed company by simply moving people out of the office, but maintain the same policies and practises as you had before. 

Starting in March this is what most of us did, and by and large, it has been a remarkable success. Every credible survey of remote working (under pandemic conditions) has shown that for the majority of people, perhaps 70-75%, it has worked, and worked well. For the balance it very much has not. And it has become clear what it is we miss, and don’t miss, from our old, more office based lives. For more on this please visit leesmanindex.com, where they have a wealth of detailed analysis.

We are now though at a crunch point. We’ve been working, by decree, remotely for eight months or so. Long enough to realise that the old ways of working, based on 4/5 days a week of physical proximity to our co-workers, are perhaps not the best way to operate, when apart from each other. Hence complaints about too many Zoom meetings, long hours, burn out and lack of connection. Adrenaline got us through the first few months, but now we need something different.

It’s not working remotely that is the problem, it’s not knowing how to work remotely. And the biggest problem of all is when management doesn’t know either. That’s when we start getting comments about ‘you cannot do XYZ at home’. Better stated they would be saying “I cannot do XYZ at home”, because that is the real issue. When managers do not know how to manage remote teams, problems start to arise.

We need some training.

Take a look at the tech companies. Twitter have told their employees there is no need to come back to the office, Google & Facebook have said don’t bother till mid 2021. Gitlab & Automattic both employ over 1200 people, across 60+ countries, but neither have any offices. Box say work anywhere till 2021, and then we’re going hybrid. Dropbox is going ‘Virtual First’, as is Shopify. And on it goes.

Each of these companies are amongst the fastest growing, most valuable companies in the world. With many of the highest paid employees. And they’ve moved to being distributed with hardly any issues. Why? Because these are digital first companies, where technology is used throughout every process, workflow and project. Where data is in the Cloud and everyone is equipped with quality hardware, software and services that enable pervasive communication and collaboration. Where work has mostly gone asynchronous, and interaction is mainly through a wide range of online SaaS (Software as a Service) tools such as Slack, Trello, Asana, Jira, Workday, Notion, Miro and Mural. In short, where all the things many real estate people say are only possible in the office, happen outside an office.

We need to learn from this. We need to adopt some of these tools, become familiar with how truly digital companies work, and how they think, and how they communicate, and mentor, and learn, and innovate. Because these types of companies (and they will increasingly not be confined to tech companies) can be super efficient and blindingly effective. If your company comes up against such an organisation you better be prepared for some serious competition, because as digital native companies they will be, ceteris paribus, hard to beat.

None of which is an argument for ‘the office is dead’. Tech companies are different to non tech companies but even they will still be taking a lot of space. Less than they probably would have pre-Covid but still plenty of it. And offices are still the best places for certain activities. And most companies will take office space, subject to it being designed and managed in a manner that actually delivers value. 

But as an industry we must stop kidding ourselves that our customers need an office, that without an office they will not be able to innovate, or collaborate, or share knowledge, or grow. All of these things are possible with #NoOffice. Our job is to demonstrate why they should WANT an office. Why having an office enables them to do some things better than they could without an office. And more particularly why this office is better than that office. Without real differentiation we are just commoditised box builders. When your customers no longer need your product your Brand, what you stand for, becomes the most important asset you have. As I have said before, real estate is no longer about satisfying needs, it is about creating desire. 

So lets get moving on up-skilling our industry. Let’s stop talking like analogue dinosaurs. No more ‘you can’t do XYZ online’. You can do everything online. Let’s learn the tools our digital customers use. Let’s grasp that real estate comes in many forms, and that ‘the office’ is going to mean something different in the future. Wherever our customers want to work, we need to be there. We need to give them what they want, not what we have to sell. We need to think like they do, act like they do, and innovate like they do. 

If we want to attract the best customers, there really is no alternative.

Very good words and pretty reasonable opinions. I still think it is needing greater depth. Numbers, data, examples, confidence, culture, people returning properly to the office... none of which yet are mature enough in the industry to make technology/working from home/ hybrid space usage" the new normal". A few months away yet and a busy 2021 to 2022 ahead but the foundations and seeds have been sown.

Tom Charrier

Property investor. Bestselling author. Podcast host.

3y

Excellent. I think it’s also necessary to see the office as more than just a ‘work’ function. It was born out of work, but it provides a big social aspect too: seeing/making friends, meeting partners (apparently 1/3 relationships started at work?), getting away from home (young kids? Necessary!) etc. What will the third order effects and opportunities be?

Like
Reply

Read with a measure of confirmation bias... Apple [likely] developed the M1 chip in labs with hoards of very intelligent tech workers backed up with product architects and marketing teams who may have worked remote, these individuals are largely polymaths. The best minds in the world adapt to online task management platforms easily, they code as children. This is level 1 implementation of code. Lifesciences tech too... Hybrid working practices are probably similar >> lab as above, [deep work] in groups in labs, [light work], remote (marketing, sales, finance, customer support, middle management) all easily achievable online. These are our tenants... Hence offices aren't required for commodity work [Task defined. Output measured.], in fact, the inefficiency (chat at the cooler) may be a disadvantage, but cannot be discounted for the spark and innovation that may flow following... But our work... Our deep work might be [collaboration], in a group, face to face we can express what we are trying to achieve much quicker, how that meshes with others, and measure the outputs instantly (visual feedback, clients sucking through their teeth, etc) this simply cannot be captured with online communication*. *Well captured by @Janan Ganesh in his November 13th piece in the FT "Zoom and the lost art of interruption" https://www.ft.com/content/5745fc60-b0db-4958-bdf4-3bb6307e190d That is a fraction of what we do, our deep work (calculation, consideration, thought, creativity) can be done away from the office, without distraction. In fact much better according to Cal Newport [Deep Work]. I love this debate but largely support your conclusion, we need to learn online working practices and quickly... [Asynchronous work] is the future we have all been dreaming off, now if we can just find the discipline to work [Asychonously] instead of [Continiously] Keep up the great work Antony Slumbers

Like
Reply
steve hutton

Creating, Building and Managing Businesses

3y

The world is changing and the approach to work is also changing. And the way we approach the strategy for 2021 and beyond is not about offices/WFH. It's about a whole cultural shift. There will be protectionism at every level. There will be cultural differences. There will be a lack of knowledge to properly inform those that make decisions or heavily influence decisions. And Money.....it'll be about the money. From the very top of the tree (property investor etc) to the bottom (whoever you want to class in that bracket - it's an illustration to make the point). And as long as those two extremes remain, then it'll be one hell of a fight. The reason the tech firms (again a generalisation) have blown the world apart is because they aren't 'traditionalists'. Some are total 'disruptors', which could well be too radical for anyone. But the ones who approach it from a more compassionate way will prevail. 2021 could be interesting.

Like
Reply
Anna Sundukova

Products & Services | Strategy & Innovation | Passionate about urban futures, community, positive systemic change, transformational leadership | Leading global research-driven innovation projects

3y

Truly agree and have just seen this with my own eyes in practice. Just completed a workplace experience and strategy project for an AI company and saw this transformation so clearly through user research. Almost a 100 peopel and growing, decided to go remote first post pandemic and not expand the office of just 450m2 (though could have). Because the value of the office completely transformed from having a seat-management role to a community management role. so there you go, already a real life example for your words! 😊👍

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Explore topics